The graph is Nigel Dessau of official of AMD company senior vice president, presiding sale
On June 5 afternoon message, be apart from an European Union to be not worth a month to Intel antitrust punishment, the core of a whole world of company of old rival AMD of Intel is in charge of high recently compose rich guest, painful the harm that approves Intel forestall to bring, and with respect to a few heat problems about Intel forestall " answer doubt dispels doubts " , he expresses, the Intel control to the industry such big, "Honest too beyond the mark " .
AMD senior vice president holds Nigel Dessau of presiding sale official concurrently to carried rich passenger recently, expressed a 3000 more than word (after the interpreter becomes Chinese) " harangue " , elaborated the view that he encounters antitrust is punished to Intel in detail.
It is in this Chinese translated term " still counterpoise at civilian " in rich guest, nigel Dessau style of writing is biting, point to each pain spot of Intel continuously. His analysis says, the forestall of Intel reachs a choice in the price, innovation 3 respects, all brought a harm to innovation of IT industry, science and technology and consumer, and with respect to these 3 respects, one by one undertook an analysis.
Nigel Dessau still breaks the industry in the case with respect to Intel ridge in a field a few " view " refer commentate, for instance he explained the European Union punishs Intel aftertreatment implement the price won't rise, explained the client has the value of option.
"Intel ignores law all the time for years, use its huge forestall profit to de most popular selling dog crates large cide to the qualification of cup cup a thick soup is divided inside the industry. Frankly speaking, a one company adjusts sheet the is like this big control of the industry, really beyond the mark. " Nigel Dessau is written, "For the forestall company that acquires commercial success to profit of forestall of a support, this means prospect extremely will bleak. This means prospect extremely will bleak..
To afore-mentioned opinion on public affairs of Nigel Dessau, AMD company shows, "Its opinion on public affairs represents individual opinion only, do not represent the footing of AMD, strategy or point of view. The tripartite link in the article is offerred for convenience purpose, unless make clear a specification, AMD does not assume responsibility to should linking the content of the website, also do not show to the silent of its content on behalf of AMD approbate. " (Xiong Li)
The rich guest that holds Nigel Dessau of presiding sale official concurrently for AMD senior vice president below translates full text:
Still counterpoise at civilian
Above all, let me begin today's topic with a statement and request. Today's article is longer than wanting at ordinary times, but the news that comes from Brussels has epoch-making sense, take up so large space has been been none, it is worth to we are dug deep and think. T dog crates large he regulation of IT market is about to change -- if I think had begun to happen, or already was in actually happen, so ask forgiveness the comment below me.
Forever.
We are in read and the statement of committee of analytic European Union about rights and interests of consumer of protective IT industry. At first sight, I think the European Union will start the revolution of a world-shaking in IT bound. Today's IT bound hide the truth from the masses, fall to operate in the person, the cost of raw materials that it pays for end item is less than 1/3, gobble up the major gain of the product however. This adjudication has regulation of latent capacity change most really, make the client's consummate commerce principle is able to reveal. As a kind of by-product, we also foreknow at the same time, it will cross the one condition that gives materiality on the road that long-term technology innovates.
The doing that the Intel company perhaps thinks to let you believe it just is concerned " discount " , actually otherwise. This ruling last a period of time is investigated more 8 years, declare publicly the Intel company is with be issued to lower levels: The first, abuse its forestall earning to do the trade that dominates to hold the balance; The 2nd, or so client buys what, where to buy; The 3rd, if computer manufacturer, supplier, shopkeeper does not follow the regulation of Intel, will be punished severely what kind ofly. And what European Union committee wants this to check. To this, we applause applaud, if you want to purchase computer or valuable innovation, that you also should such.
Appeared 3 problems: The price, innovation, choice.
The price
There is rumour to say inside course of study, early adjudication is made in European Union committee before, allege below Intel illicit, once adjudication is carried out, will bring about rise in price. This character is disloyal, why?
Regard Intel as the competitor in microprocessor industry, the business to Intel -- sell chip, we also know a little about, says content has certain reliability, because sell chip,also be our business. We just serve our client with disparate means.
Rise in price or depreciate?
To using the computer manufacturer of Int dog crates large strong el CPU character, the final price of its product (reach the price that sells a client subsequently) it is the result after considering list price, quantity discount and rake-off integratedly. Try to col dvd discovery or when the Intel company the truth, committee member of suggestive European Union is in force its to stop with computer manufacturer " rake-off plans " , and in fact, completely antitrust of European Union committee does not superintend an orgnaization to want Intel to do this. European Union committee just is in force Intel non-payment so called " rake-off " , however conditional " faithful money " . Lyon is in division of the Tang Dynasty of no less than " patristic " in be said, "I want them to cannot reject the reward that I pay. "I want them to cannot reject the reward that I pay..
These money are used at restricting computer manufacturer to indicate act by the Intel company entirely. What to still have otherwise other option? The means of European Union committee, pay " faithful pay " be no good, but quantity discount permits. Intel still is not changing his quantity discount is offerred below the circumstance of final price. But they cannot the faithfulness with conditional reoccupy spends pay to control supplies chain and prevent AMD or the product of other company enters open market.
The Intel company shares the control of authority to IT market, make product value maintains empty effectively tall. Remember please, the product of AMD has higher sexual price all the time more coequal than mixing or more the property performance of actor. If you take care relevant data, the price that can discover us is more average than the competitor low piece 30% to 50% . This so warlike result won't be to force a client to pay higher price, and can enjoy more favourable price only, because Intel must be participated in directly,arrive in price competition.
satin pjs Enjoy better service with more favourable price
The other manufacturer such as AMD He Weicheng ever was elbowed out to give the market in cold blood by Intel for a time, of European market open will make these manufacturers have an opportunity to approach customer. To consumer, this is extremely big favour undoubtedly, mean than before more choices, more sex price competes than what go up. We believe, fair competition can affect the price, on the market with be run normal, its should be product price fall, consumer is benefited from which as a result.
The gain that the adjudication of European Union committee perhaps can cause Intel at the same time drops -- the core place that this is a problem, also be why we anticipate Intel is met the reason of by hook and crook stand. They begin concern really. What we see no less than -- of Intel forestall times terminative, for the forestall company that acquires commercial success to profit of forestall of a support, this means prospect extremely will bleak.
Intel ignores law all the time for years, use its huge forestall profit to decide to the qualification of cup cup a thick soup is divided ins the most popular selling dvd discovery ide the industry. Frankly speaking, a one company adjusts sheet the is like this big control of the industry, really beyond the mark. AMD referred civil to the antitrust of Intel suit to American court 2005, among them a word of respecting: "Obtaining commerce to succeed is one and the same, but with position of monopoly of illegal means hold together it is other one thing completely. But with position of monopoly of illegal means hold together it is other one thing completely..
Adjudicate on 3 times
The 3rd antitrust adjudication to Intel makes clear, different competition superintendency machine happens to coincide the ground made same ruling, and have sufficient fact and the ruling that the cognizance Intel that evidence supports his to make already violated antitrust law. Apparently Intel failed, censorial orgnaization had seen nitty-gritty. This is worth to spend bit of time to think.
Einstein says well, unwisdom is repeat same thing to expect to get different result however. This is Intel is in the 3rd times continuously with orgnaization of 3 big independent a dog stairs for bed ntitrust in contending, suffer a defeat. Before punish Intel, the time that European Union committee spent 8 years many analysed Intel deep in the market doing.
Intel just objects, or the heart that is without be repentant to his doing. I do not know you are met how be done, but if somebody reminds me for the first time, I consider as a favour; If another person tells me same thing again, I can feel very interesting; When it happens the 3rd times continuously, I am met learn a lesson. Be being changed is you, also meet such doing?
Innovate
Intel perhaps says this adjudication will strangle the motivation of innovation. I am written in rich guest before a few weeks, the unfavorable situation with current Intel is the immediate result that competition brings completely. Want to make author have more innovation, must have competition. So I think, competition also is beneficial to Intel.
Compete even if innovate
Tell the truth, if AMD is in 2003 did not mix in Opteron Athlon 64 X86-64 is rolled out in processor instruction collect, intel may force global IT course of study to use it particular and costly An Teng processor, and our both neither wants to also do not need this. The competitive pressure that comes from AMD and the ability that its lead innovation force Intel progress, for this we feel proud.
No less than has said before me, imitating is the most genuine adulatory. The Nehalem chip that Intel releases recently (call Xeon 5500 series now) was 2003 the Opteron X86-64 that AMD rolls out of the design extend a product. After 7 years today, the integrated memory controller that ability has Intel to contend to it is pushed to the market.
I suggest you see us establish the 40 innovation that come for years history, its enough explains AMD is in the innovation pulsation that computational processor and graphical processor domain held in 40 years in the past, arrogant person achievement got job inside approbate extensively.
Choice
Most business affairs tutorial of the foundation also can tell you, having many suppliers always is big to your business have profit -- that component that holds the balance on your stock detailed account especially. In light of outer bound, computer manufacturer seems to be purchased to component have option and control right, this also applies to CPU likewise, right?
Where is their what is there against it?
The freedom of the choice
Another accusation that European Union committee sues Intel is the right that makes computer manufacturer chooses CPU without freedom. Once they have a choice additionally, should pay far be more than redound punish severely, this makes they are in a dilemma. Remember, intel devotes oneself to to create a kind of false appearance that has option for years, in fact its real purpose is the freedom that allows consumer to lose an option.
The main problem that counterpoises around consumer preference is: "If consumer does not know they are not had 2 anthology, who still can care about their rights and interests? Who still can care about their rights and interests??
Ground of resolute and decisive of committee of European Union punish says: "Have! " the consumer that European Union committee already admitted Europe was stripped option beneficial, stated its are right the attention of European consumer interest. To consumer, OK on the bazaar of the diversification that offer money follow one's inclinations from goods chooses over there numerous businessman, this is the freedom of the choice. Japan and Korea ever also had said this.
Somebody should be refuted, because AMD and our partner is eliminated illegally to be besides the market,saying I write this Bo Wen is, so this is to concern us of personal interest. It is a fact, we admit. But our defective and objective plead, cannot produce any negative effects to bribery and threatening evidence, also cannot change European Union committee to make wise make a decision, the station comes out to protect consumer interest, set out from overall situation the practice that defends business circles ecosystem.
More what is more,the rather that this adjudication expended 8 years many, is you always cannot say European Union commission carelessly make adjudication?
The choice in the market
I once heard somebody argues say, if AMD has better product early with respect to get victory, this is off base. Competition superintends an orgnaization to had confirmed the 3rd time dog stairs s, intel company is used assist the product that approach step will come elbow out AMD, make the product of AMD, although highly competitive, also gain ground in great quantities on normal market hard.
Although Intel is passed,use inside global limits illegal, inequitable method, but AMD and other manufacturer still inexorable, retain oneself competition ability through ceaseless innovation, the colossus of the resource advantage that having 10 times to this constituted a challenge, this have to astonishing. Intel tries us weak of fashion into frail, ascribe the best selling dvd discovery the problem to our " incompetent " . The historical record that does not have a person is without a flaw, but the innovation ability with consciousness of our unremitting, competition and constant in a steady stream is the first of all. We gain an advantage on X86 proc dvd discovery channel essor market, graphical processing respect is eminent also.
The market position that if the other competitor of we and Intel is in equal competition all the time,considers, the route that the technology progresses will go further. What does that mean to the client? Mean more lower price, choices!
Will be how heart-stirring.
You, consumer
The competition that thanks independent and brave, altruistic dedication superintends an orgnaization, bring infinite hope to the industry. This also is the original intention of European Union committee, this is the war between Intel and AMD not just, also be consumer rights and interests guard battle.
We exist because of this. 3 independent competition superintend authoritative orgnaization to represent the whole world now the consumer of nearly 500 million announces, intel controlled IT market to damage consumer rights and interests with the method of forestall, must stop instantly this kind is tortious. No less than is said before me, be opposite from Intel the first reaction that adjudicates on 3 times continuously, can reach the following conclusion: Or Intel company is returned not learn a lesson, they just do not care about or law, more never mention it care about consumer.
Can next perhaps American superintendency orgnaization also make an explanation to Intel?
No comments:
Post a Comment