Committee of European Union of appeal commissioner doubt punishs Intel one case

Beijing time is early on August 8 a message, occupy foreign media to report now, a commissioner of European Union appeal says, when personnel of investigation of European Union committee is handling Intel antitrust case, did not consider a few pivotal meeting records that are helpful for Intel.

Commissioner of appeal of this European Union says, the conference record that a PC manufacturer submits shows, this company chooses dog crates large best buy the processor of Intel, it is to stem from function consideration purely. " wall street daily " the report copy that obtained compose of place of commissioner of appeal of this European Union. According to the description of this report, not Dai Er of sign one's name is in charge of high express at investigating personnel to European Union committee 2006, AMD processor function " too poor " . Nevertheless, because European Union committee did not save conference record of the dialog, how is should be in charge of high accordingly described after all, now also have no way is witting.

norton internet antivirus

And when the record that asks for afore-mentioned dialogs to European Union committee when Intel, european Union committee also rejected to ask and express dog crates large of Intel to do not have a record.

Thi the best selling dvd discoverys year the best selling dog stairsMay, the European Union is a name to be in to Intel with violating antitrust law with 1.06 bi the most popular selling dog stairs llion euro (add up to 1.45 billion dollar about) amerce, this also is European Union history punishs sheet one piece the number that attends to go out is the largest. European Union committee expresses, intel passes a variety of unfair competition act, attract OEM(original equipment to make) the processor that uses Intel with shopkeeper. Include to pay fee to OEM among them, the requirement is deferred roll out the commercial computer that is based on AMD processor. Additional, intel once still adopted the way that offers sales commission, ask the AMD computer in product line maintains OEM him general in 20% the following.

Because amerce is exorbi dvd discovery tant, intel mentions to court of European Union first trial subsequently appeal is no wonder. What Dan Ji blames is, the appeal of Intel has to think in the view, the European Union should fine encroach human rights. Intel expresses, this kind of amerce just can give out in the investigation in criminal case only, and this second investigation attributes administrative investigation. Intel and other by European Un dog crates large breed ion committee qualitative think to infringe the company of antitrust law, th dog stairs e investigation of property of this kind of pure administration makes acquire enough apologetic right so that he does not have, and judicial order also ought to be improved.

The personage inside course of study thinks, although the report of commissioner of European Union appeal reverses a court decision hard, but the suspicion that can cause the outside to investigate dvd discovery 3 personnel justice sex and transparency to the European Union however, and this make with respect to enough court of European Union first trial reduces Intel to fine amount when was adjudged 2010. (Book Yu)