European Union antitrust dare give heavy fist

10 thousand army

Not long ago of European Union committee made the adjudication that violates statute of European Union competition to Intel company of American microprocessor tycoon, requirement Intel stops to violate act instantly, be in with 1.06 billion euro (add up to 1.45 billion dollar about) amerce, its amount was exceeded greatly right last year American Microsoft the fine of 899 million euro, once more refresh the European Union amerce to behavior of single company monopoly record. In recent years, the European Union giv dog crates large dogs es heavy fist to attack the forestall action of transnational corporation repeatedly, had become global antitrust stand for war. memory laptop toshiba

The large transnational corporation that does not have avoid in infestation of world other area lowers his head to take time and again in the European Union soft, because the European Union has perfect antitrust law laws and regulations,be of system and standard execute the law system. Be based on distinctive politics, economy and social setting, the market structure that brings about forestall in order to restrain all sorts of unfair competition behavior, limitation easily, competition policy that promote and maintains competition to be a tenet is regarded as the basic system of market economy in Europe. The European Union arises for the competitive policy of core with antitrust at going up century 50 time, what the the European Economic is born is wear in the mark " Roman treaty " in, decided the agreement that objects restricting competition and the competitive regulation that prohibit abusing the market to control a position first. Through development dog stairs and ramps of a few years, the European Union forms system of more complete plan of antitrust law law gradually, basically mix by the byelaw of board of community treaty, European Union and European Union committee the collective composition such as the court decision of the adjudication of committee of announce, European Union and European court.

As the ceaseless development of economic globalization, more and more transnational corporation spread out production to manage in the European Union be bought with the enterprise and activity, this is in on the whole aggravate the market of the European Union competes, but the behaviour of competition of the limitation that cross a state that also caused certain domain. The antitrust policy of the European Union does not have the forestall behavior of pair of foreign capital enterprises to make special provision, but no matter be the tycoon crossing a state besides the enterprise of the the most popular selling dog crates large European Union or European Union, want its to managed behavior to be formed to the market competition condition of the European Union only damage, can be by the cover sooner or later under the arm of the law of policy of European Union antitrust.

brooch pins

Intel fell big fall this, because its manage action,be maintained to be abusive market to control a position by European Union committee namely. European Union committee is the executant of policy of European Union competition, the competitive total bureau of committee subordinate carries out specific antitrust work. Europ the best selling dvd discoveryean Union committee basically centers in 3 respects to the monitoring of behavior of transnational corporation forestall: Is amalgamative whether can damage effective competition. European Union committee thinks through investigation, intel uses his powerful market dominant position, wait for means through offerring a discount to PC manufacturer, force these manufacturers to sign exclusiveness agreement, perhaps buy the chip that dog stairs produces by Intel entirely almost entirely, force PC manufacturer to defer or cancel the product put on sale of its competitor chip. These behavior of Intel hampered market fairness competes, damaged the relevant and legitimate rights and interests of consumer, what sufferred European Union committee consequently is heavy punish.

European Union committee has a normative program to the investigation of case of transnational corporation antitrust and adjudication, this is in Intel antitrust is behaved very apparently in the case. The circumstance that European Union committee is complained according to tripartite normally or oneself master, launch investigation of put on record to antitrust case. Intel antitrust case is started according to the appeal of company of its competitor AMD at first. When European Union committee is surveying experience record company, carry the kind that sends letter to the enterprise commonly, requirement enterprise provides management data and relevant detail well and truly, the enterprise that does not carry out according to this will is in in order to fine. Intel once answered the requirement of European Union committee, provided the detailed data that its collect in the whole world and European battalion. For collect more evidence, european Union committee still can carry the kind of abrupt assault, the office place to experience record company even the abode of company controller undertakes checking. During Intel case is investigated, handle a case many office that personnel ever entered Intel twice to be located in Europe and the office place that wear Er, HP to wait for Intel client had undertaken ransacking. In addit dvd discovery 3 ion, european Union committee returns the opinion that meets consult competitor and client, whether to break the law to the competitive behavior of the enterprise thereby make integrated judgement.

spring poolIf European Union committee thinks the enterprise is p the best selling dog crates largeut in the act that violates competitive law to decide put on record is tried really, must inform experience case of the enterprise, give them to elaborate the opportunity of own viewpoint. The question that experience record company can be accused make rewrite, still can apply for to hold oral hearing, state oneself opinion face to face. European Union committee has held the hearing that close the door technically for Intel. After if be in,passing investigation and program of hearing of witnesses, committee still maintained an enterprise to violate the competitive law of the European Union, can make final ruling, dog crates large best buy requirement enterprise stops what be maintained to violate act, be in the amerce with certain amount possibly. If the enterprise refuses to obey to the decision of committee, can to court of European Union first trial or European Union court mentions appeal. According to media coverage, the Intel company has appealed to court of European Union first trial, ask the amerce that reverses European Union commission rules. Next year of estimation technique courtyard just is met at this point case make a court decision.

To behavior of transnational corporation forestall obtain evidence the job is very time-consuming bad news force, the time that the European Union lasted several years to the investigation of Intel competition behavior. Once European Union committee passed investigation to obtain enough and exact evidence, it is met lawfully none ground of be irresolute when firmness is needed gives punish again. According to the concerned regulation of the European Union, european Union committee can be in to violating an enterprise with on its one year total sales revenue 10% the following amerce. In recent years the whole world of Intel year sale is in above of 30 billion dollar, calculate accordingly, the amerce to Intel can reach 30 much dollars at most, although the fine of 1.45 billion dollar is far did not reach its upper limit, but also occupied Intel of net last year gain 30% the left and right sides. This also makes clear, although the amerce of high specified number of the European Union is not the fatal position of transnational corporation park that wants to will break the law, however meaning the limitative competition behaviour that prohibiting and penalizes them, but amerce must be punished let transnational corporation remember to the end of one's life, make they not dare the h most popular selling dvd discovery igh tension line of policy of antitrust of European Union of again optional lay a finger on.

(The author is economy of world of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and political institute researcher)