Sunday, January 15, 2012

Intel AMD criticises the other side destroys evidence each other

[dispatch of Sai Di net] on October 15 message, according to foreign medi the best selling dvd discoverya coverage, this week of Intel and dog stairs best buy AMD 3 to Telahua regional court of city United States refers a motion, requirement punish makes do. The information reservation in the bilateral antitrust case that offers to put forward 2005 with AMD is concerned.



The motion of Intel says, AMD did not withhold it appropriately to sued the file in the law case of Intel 2005. AMD is ill-natured oneself failure that try hard and tries to conceal oneself to cour the best selling dog crates larget and Intel.



Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy says, it is exaggerated that AMD concerns the view that withholds a document. Since Intel s dvd discovery ince its issue was being shown 2007, AMD claims the plan that it has the wonderful file in reserving this long table. Now, the case is very clear most popular selling dog stairs , AMD does not have such doing. A few officials of AMD an the most popular selling dog stairs d employee did not withhold thousands of file and email.



Intel is in the problem " argument summary: The thing that should command AMD does Intel for a long time of one's own accord before " the point of view that oneself summarized in legal file. Intel says, be in at least January 2005, AMD predicted its lawsuit to Intel reasonably, and did all businesses that prospective accuser plans for this law case. But, AMD did not withhold relevant document. AMD has legal obligation to withhold these documents. 15 pin vga



Intel says, it is made up for hard or change to obtaining evidence the cost that the error that discovers in the process has made Intel paid several dollars. Intel thinks it was abided by this plans and corrected most popular selling dvd discovery an error successfully. Accordingly, intel offerred the doc dog crates large best buy ument of near 200 million page to AMD.



This motion that Zhou San refers to the court says AMD, of Intel offerring do not have a basis. AMD criticises Intel did not withhold testimony. AMD denies Intel to had obtained successful statement about the effort that makes up for a mistake.



AMD says, the core of problem of Intel reservation f the most popular selling dog crates large ile is Intel did not cancel radical delete a system automatically, although unquestionable authoritative branch has asked Intel cancel this system. Of Intel delete shredded paper machine automatically still continueing to move, without any safety precautions.



AMD says in conclusion, it had submitted the jury statement of a proposal to the court, the bias that so that correct,causes as a result of Intel. This instruction says, the jury Intel that should accuse was destroyed by tens of thousands the file related the portion.



Author: Tian Hong

No comments:

Post a Comment