Intel AMD refers motion to criticise the other side destroys evidence to beautiful court

Beijing time on October 15 morning message, according to foreign media coverage, intel and AMD Zhou San pull court of China city place to carry a motion especially to the United States respectively, the requirement gives sanction to the other side.

These two motion all with AMD2005 year the antitrust lawsuit that mentions to Intel is concerned. Intel accuses AMD fails to sue bring a case to court then at that time in sufficient reservation file, say in statement: "AMD subreption, try to cover action of its neglect one's duty to court and Intel. Try to cover action of its neglect one's duty to court and Intel..

Intel thin dog crates large ks, the statement that AMD withho most popular selling dvd discovery lds about the file was exaggerated. Intel spokesman checks Ke Muluoyi (Chuck Mulloy) says: "Since Intel since showing oneself issue 2007, AMD claims to have ' typical ' the file that plan will come to preserve this record. But look now, AMD is done not have apparently so most popular selling dog stairs do, and the part of AMD is in charge of high and employee also fails to withhold the file of thousands of and email. And the part of AMD is in charge the best selling dog stairs of high and employee also fails to withhold the file of thousands of and email..

In having a case then, intel published a problem to be " argument overview: The thing that AMD ought to be enforced to be engaged in Intel already of one's own accord " summary. dog stairs Intel expresses: "Be in at least in January 2005, AMD predicted the legal lawsuit to Intel reasonably, the business that performed an accuser to ought to be done... but AMD did not begin to withhold relevant document, and this is law gifts however its obligation. And this is law gifts however its obligation..

usb harddrive enclosureIntel expresses, ever tried hard " make up for or correct " oneself are in obtain evidence the mistake that makes in the process, these mistakes had brought about Intel to cost dollar of several ten million. Intel still ex dvd discovery channel presses, had carried out the prob dog stairs and ramps lem that this plans and corrected existence successfully, because this Intel just submitted the document of nearly 200 million page to AMD.

Besides think the application of Intel does not have effectiveness besides, AMD also referred motion to the court at Zhou San, express, intel fails to withhold testimony. Claim to Intel correction measure has obtained successful practice, AMD expresses to object: "A bit power is exhausted in if Intel reachs its lawyer to be being designed and carry out a file to maintain credit balance,looking, intel can avoid completely to save the complete failure in evidential process easily originally. " AMD thinks, this one " complete failure " bring about Intel for many times of ballyhoo make up for measure to did not win a success finally.

AMD still expresses in the file: "Intel withholds the core of file problem to depend on, fail to remove response is quick delete a system automatically, although authorities already public proclamation asks its remove this system... of Intel delete shredded paper machine automatically still continueing to move, and without any safety precautions. And without any safety precautions..

The ability that AMD still accuses to Intel wins a case to its was caused serious and beyond recall harm, express, below the system of Intel, should meet without the file dog stairs best buy that saves artificially only by permanent delete.

AMD dvd discovery expresses in summary, had submitted proposal of instruction of a jury to the court, so that eliminate the bias of by Intel annul evidence generation. This instruction thinks, jury ought to be informed, intel destroyed the relevant documentation of tens of thousands of. (Book Yu)