Introduction: Lu Yi of AMD predecessor CEO wisdom (Hector Ruiz) is written yesterday civil say, intel adjudicates to the European Union its hamper the market competes makes response is in shirk responsibility, the mistake that Intel should commit for oneself is responsible.
north face shirts
It is full text below:
When the enormous changes that how answers the market in layer of expostulatory Intel management, intel author installs Di Gelufu (Andy Grove) once had said not without truth ground: "Your responsibility is: Guide a company to walk out of branch road, make the company returns the right path again, issue emersion in new condition brilliant. Issue emersion in new condition brilliant..
Make a person regretful however and what feel accident slightly is, intel forgot this one advice it seems that. Although a large number of evidence support Europe, Japan and Korea,made antitrust adjudicates on, intel still rejects to seek a new way, the emersion in making oneself OK reach the new condition of innovation in competition is brilliant.
This week announced European Union committee to amount to the evidence of hundreds page to adjudicate in order to support its, namely t the most popular selling dvd discovery he processor chip that Intel forces its client illegally to boycott AMD to produce. And the response of Intel is disappointing rather. Statement of media of a 4 pages is shown -- be known according to me, this is Intel makes public refer first the fact of its behavior backside -- Intel is apparent already overall admitted dramatist Oscar · Wang Erde (the proposal of Oscar Wilde) : "The thing does not depend on success or failure, and depend on how shirk responsibility. And depend on how shirk responsibility..
Seeing Intel is how absolve a most popular selling dog stairs t re dog stairs for bed sponsibility:
1, Intel thinks, european Union committee " taking prejudice to undertake investigating, with per dog crates large iod change competition result. " Intel claims the adjudicative existence bias of the European Union, but what evidence dog stairs best buy did this company offer to support this one thesis? Without any evidence. European Union make this court decision show why to plant motive? Do not have any motive. Because dog crates large breed Intel knows, everybody also knows, the European Union is being taken completely without reason " prejudice " the behavior that goes investigating two competitors of American, and these two companies all are not European computer firm the most popular selling dog crates large . dearfoam slipper
2, Intel claims, "European Union committee regards major evidence as confidential data, intel cannot show to these card has public detailed explanation. " but the fact is, intel asks to undertake keeping secret to these evidence. E.g. , the adjudication of European Union committee claims, one is not mentioned in the post that the Intel tall canal of sign one's name is keeping a fellow worker, some computer firm " be bent solely on profit " . If Intel hopes to announce the fact, so the full name that whether can this company allow what European Union committee divulges its adjudicate li of cite to write a letter to be in charge of high, and mail full text?
3, Intel expresses in statement of a media, "European Union committee too the speculation that depends on the come-and-go mail according to primary stuff to make. " the means of monopolist defend oneself that this is a model, scorn any crosscurrent, even if be him Intel employee. Irrefutable evidence of this one testimony. Nevertheless, even if is such, if Intel verify occupies secret and not announce, should we evaluate Intel so to its not the description of employee of sign one's name?
4, Intel claims, "The OEM with dimensions great strong actual strength sticks card manufacturer to make Intel and photograph of AMD change sides in a war to. " after giving employee responsibility shirk, it is its client next. Nevertheless, tell me please, this in-house state of OEM manufacturer lets go up, whether to resemble out do one arrive formidably is enough diversionary the mouth of the company of Intel? This claims in portion allegation, the processor chip of use AMD will bring about the retaliation of Intel, "And be very severe and abiding retaliation likely, go to drag in all product line. Go to drag in all product line..
5, Intel expresses, "AMD ever had taken out the product that has competition ability truly to be managed wholeheartedly, also achieved great success accordingly. But AMD fails now good operation, cannot take out competitive product, this restricted what A the best selling dog crates largeMD makes to lose in the competition with Intel. " blame a victim this kind of way is not new, but blame a victim to have competition ability already, blame its to lack competition ability again, it is completely in screwy fact. The fact is, the dishonourable behavior of Intel destroyed whole microprocessor market. Sincere the verdict that issues like European Union committee, according to full-scale investigation and the documentation of countless pages, plus the witness' testimony, terminal decision " the behavior of Intel destroyed competitive pattern, reduced the choice of consumer, and block up innovate. And block up innovate..
All the time since, intel is the innovate person with banner whole world, this company still can hold this one position in future, premise is its leader layer realizes a simple fact.
Aobama's president reiterates no less than repeatedly, now is " the new era of the responsibility since bear " -- in commercial domain especially such. Intel assumes a posture earlier be equal to at its prospective foreground, honorary former days and that responsibility of current reputation, the mistake that is oneself is responsible, so the total pro the best selling dvd discoveryfit aux will be able to that competition brings is reflected earlier. Those who be benefited will be IT course of study and computer firm not just, still include the computer user of global each district. (Xiao Bin)
No comments:
Post a Comment