The European Union announces Intel to hit suppress competitor evidence

Business signs up for dispatch (reporter Luo Tian) to Intel of manufacturer of chip of global number one the day price of 1.06 billion euro punishs sheet, it is protective competiti dvd discovery 4 on after all, be still trade barrier? Yesterday, left to publish a series of evidence that come from Intel client according to punishing single European Union committee, expectation expl dog crates large dogs ains with the fact, intel existence plays the fact that presses competitor AMD, open day price to punish odd fair and reasonable.

north face shirts

Yesterday, european Union committee points out, dai Er, HP, associate the evidence that the internal document that waits for computer to the best selling dog crates largemake business and Media Saturn Holding of shopkeeper of German electron product and they show makes clear, intel used the illegal means of two kinds of types to acquire position of market dominant position.

memory card digital cameras

It is to force firstly: A data that is the most popular sell most popular selling dvd discovery ing dog stairs sues to European Union committee shows HP, intel asks " HP ought to purchase the business of at least 95% to use table machine chip to its " . It is minatory secondly: Dai Er shows in an inside data 2003, if this company purchases partial chip to AMD, so Intel can undertake revengeful the action, and meet " continuously longer, can affect all product line " .

brass faucet

Actually, had expressed in the ruling that European Union committee opened price giving a day early to punish sheet in May, intel uses his strong position, and the plan that uses illegal discount privilege to bribe PC manufacturer is deferred or cancel to use AMD chip in the product. At the same time threatening shopke dvd discovery eper can sell the PC that configures its chip only.

norton internet antivirus

Be aimed at these evidence nevertheless, intel makes a statement immediately condemned European Union committee to be opposite the investigation method of this case. "European Union committee wears blinkers in investigation, intentional person is the result that the ground intervenes the market competes, gather the evidence with favorable to accuser letter only. European Union committee is right the evidential or turn a blind eye to that with its viewpoint photograph is contrary to, or downplay, reject to gather such evidence even, its findings can be dog crates large one-sided only. Its findings can be one-sided only..

The analysis thinks, because there are a large number of Intels in European Uni the most popular selling dvd discovery on investigation " oral " the example that asks PC manufacturer does not purchase competitor product, because serve as evidence to collect a letter to need very long time proof, because of this 1.06 billion euro punish sheet after all when to be carried out still decide hard, but to Intel, its fame h dvd discovery 3 as sufferred a loss for certain.